Today. Mexico legalized abortion. This is good news because it previously allowed abortion only in cases of rape, severe birth defects, or if the woman's life was at risk. Doctors sometimes refused to perform the procedure even under those circumstances. The new law will require city hospitals to provide the procedure through the end of the first trimester and opens the way for private abortion clinics.
Last Week. The New York Times addressed FDA approval of a birth control pill that eliminates periods as long as the woman takes it. The article chronicled the mixed reactions.
The positive reactions included:
- cool my period is annoying;
- the periods women have on regular birth control pills are not real periods anyway because the pill prevents release of eggs and buildup of uterine lining; and
- "company-financed research indicating that women often feel less effective at work and school during their periods. They limit sexual activity and exercise, wear dark clothes and stay home more, resulting in absenteeism... Menstrual suppression may be particularly appealing to women who suffer severe pain, heavy bleeding or emotional problems during their periods" (taken, I assume, from 50's Home Economics slideshow).
The negative reactions were things like:
- periods are not a sickness that must be cured;
- are there risks associated with a hormone cycle less like the 28-day natural one;
- periods provide comfort that one is not pregnant;
- periods are a part of womanhood; and
- Anne Frank mused in her diary "I have the feeling that in spite of all the pain, unpleasantness and nastiness I have a sweet secret" (oh good, I was wondering what Anne Frank thought).
I'm conflicted because I think birth control pills were hugely important to women. They freed married women from the chain of baby baby baby, and they allowed single women to control their sex lives with less fear of getting knocked up and chastized. The pills basically took the wind out of the "biology as destiny" sails.
Reading the article, however, I started having all these Handmaid's Tale/Brave New World style thoughts about a future in which periods are eliminated. It creeps me out frankly. What if women who bled couldn't get jobs because they were perceived to be emotional and unfit for the workplace? Or what if women who bled couldn't get men? It really suits the societal trend to deem attractive that which is not really woman but child. We already receive the message that to be attractive we should eliminate our armpit hair, pubic hair, hips, and curves because men can only get it up for prepubescent children (silicone aside). Now we have to make sure we don't get our fucking periods? What is that bullshit?